Premiership Rugby

FloRugby Power Rankings: Ranking All 40 PREM, URC And Top 14 Teams

FloRugby Power Rankings: Ranking All 40 PREM, URC And Top 14 Teams

FloRugby ranks all 40 Gallagher PREM, URC and Top 14 clubs entering the 2026-27 season, from the title favorites to No. 40.

Sep 23, 2026 by Joe Harrington
FloRugby Power Rankings: Ranking All 40 PREM, URC And Top 14 Teams

There are 40 teams across the Gallagher PREM, United Rugby Championship and Top 14, but putting them into one ranking requires something more complicated than comparing league tables. Toulouse plays a different schedule from Leinster. Northampton does not have to survive 26 rounds of the Top 14. The Vodacom Bulls deal with travel challenges that Bath never will. The question here is simpler: Which clubs look strongest entering the 2026-27 season?

This is a power ranking, not a prediction of the final standings. Last season matters, particularly championships, playoff runs and European performance, but so do offseason changes, roster depth, international talent, coaching, home-field advantage and evidence that a club can consistently beat elite opposition. A team that finished lower domestically can therefore rank above a reigning champion from another competition.

One other important note: This is a preseason ranking. Although the Top 14 season already may be underway when this is published, none of those 2026-27 results are being considered. The clock stops before Round 1. With that established, here is FloRugby’s ranking of all 40 PREM, URC and Top 14 clubs entering the new season.

No. 1 Stade Toulousain

Toulouse remains the standard against which everyone else is measured. Another Top 14 championship reinforced a remarkable level of domestic consistency, and the club retains a core built around Antoine Dupont, Romain Ntamack and Thomas Ramos. Adding Tommaso Menoncello only makes an already loaded roster more imposing. Toulouse combines something almost nobody else in this ranking can match: elite international talent, enormous depth, championship experience and the ability to overwhelm high-level opposition when its attack gets moving. Leinster and Bordeaux have legitimate arguments, but until somebody consistently knocks Toulouse from the top, No. 1 remains the safest call.

No. 2 Leinster Rugby

The reigning URC champions enter directly behind Toulouse because few clubs possess a stronger combination of talent, depth and organizational consistency. Leinster finally converted another dominant season into a URC championship, reinforcing that this roster remains capable of surviving international absences and still reaching the biggest matches. The province can field elite Irish internationals at the top of the depth chart while continuing to develop replacements underneath them. The distinction between Leinster and Toulouse is narrow. Toulouse gets the edge because of its recent domestic championship standard, but Leinster remains one of the safest bets in club rugby to contend for both its league and the Champions Cup.

No. 3 Union Bordeaux Begles

An eighth-place Top 14 team normally would have no business sitting at No. 3 in a ranking like this. Winning back-to-back Champions Cups changes everything. Bordeaux has repeatedly demonstrated that when Europe's biggest matches arrive, its ceiling is championship level. Damian Penaud and Louis Bielle-Biarrey headline a devastating attacking group, while UBB scored 822 points and 113 tries domestically despite somehow missing the French playoffs. That's the reason Bordeaux sits behind Toulouse and Leinster: week-to-week consistency remains a legitimate question. But if this ranking is partly about which teams nobody wants to face in a major knockout match, Bordeaux unquestionably belongs among the top three.

No. 4 DHL Stormers Rugby

The Stormers may have the greatest upward potential of any team in the top 10. They already finished third in the URC and reached the semifinals, and now Siya Kolisi, Cheslin Kolbe and Wilco Louw join a roster featuring Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu, Damian Willemse and Evan Roos. That's enough talent to win the competition. The Stormers also showed their ceiling last season with emphatic victories over elite opposition, including Glasgow and Leinster in Cape Town. What keeps them outside the top three is proof away from home in the biggest knockout environments. If that changes, the Stormers have the personnel to become the best South African club and challenge for No. 1.

No. 5 Glasgow Warriors

Glasgow's 2025-26 season was a few moments away from becoming extraordinary. The Warriors finished first in the URC regular season and went 4-0 in their Champions Cup pool, beating Sale, Toulouse, Clermont and Saracens. Then their two defining knockout defeats came by tiny margins: Toulon edged them in Europe and the Bulls came back to eliminate them in the URC semifinal. That's elite evidence. The concern is offseason attrition, with significant contributors leaving a roster that now must prove its system can absorb those losses. Glasgow does not need to discover how to become a contender. It needs to finish the championship opportunities it already knows how to create.

No. 6 Vodacom Bulls Rugby

Another trip to the URC final keeps the Bulls firmly among the best clubs in this ranking. Pretoria remains one of the competition's most difficult destinations, and the Bulls again demonstrated their ability to navigate a full regular season and win knockout matches, including their dramatic semifinal comeback at Glasgow. The 36-7 loss to Leinster in the final exposed the remaining gap at the very top. There also has been meaningful offseason turnover, including the departures of Wilco Louw, Ruan Nortje, David Kriel and Kurt-Lee Arendse. Still, the Bulls have something many more glamorous rosters lack: repeated proof that they can turn talent into deep postseason runs.

No. 7 RC Toulonnais

Toulon has returned to the conversation about Europe's genuine elite rather than merely being a famous club with a formidable home ground. The combination of forward power, physicality and Stade Mayol gives Toulon a high floor, while its Champions Cup victory over Glasgow provided important evidence that this team can win against top cross-league opposition. The roster remains loaded with international quality and has enough muscle to make almost any knockout match uncomfortable. What separates Toulon from the six teams above is consistency across an entire domestic campaign. The ceiling is obvious. The next step is making elite-level Toulon the version opponents see every week rather than only at its best.

No. 8 Northampton Saints

The defending Gallagher PREM champions deserve to begin as England's highest-ranked club. Northampton went 14-1-3, finished first in the regular season and scored a league-record 104 tries before beating Leicester and Exeter to win the championship. Fin Smith, Alex Mitchell, Tommy Freeman and Henry Pollock give Saints an attacking core capable of creating problems that few English teams can solve. There are reasons for caution. George Furbank has left for Harlequins, the overall squad looks slightly thinner and Northampton conceded 536 regular-season points despite winning the league. The champions remain dangerous enough to repeat, but sustaining last year's extraordinary attacking output is now the challenge.

No. 9 Bath Rugby

Bath's trophy haul did not reflect how strong the team actually was in 2025-26. Johann van Graan's side went 13-5, produced a plus-222 regular-season differential and reached both the PREM semifinal and Champions Cup semifinal. Finn Russell, Ben Spencer, Ollie Lawrence, Henry Arundell and Santiago Carreras give Bath a backline capable of operating at championship level in England or Europe. The concern is the forward transition. Thomas du Toit and Alfie Barbeary are major departures, with du Toit's front-row versatility particularly difficult to replace. Bath remains a legitimate title contender, but it enters with more questions up front than Northampton and the elite clubs above it.

No. 10 Montpellier Herault Rugby

Montpellier's return to the Top 14 final restored the club to a level it had not consistently occupied since its 2022 championship. Last season provided something more meaningful than theoretical roster quality: evidence that Montpellier can survive the Top 14 grind and still be standing at the end. The club also has the physical profile required to make knockout rugby uncomfortable and enough talent to avoid becoming a one-dimensional forward team. Montpellier sits below Bath and Northampton because the very top clubs in this ranking have stronger evidence across multiple competitions. But this is no longer a rebound project. Montpellier enters 2026-27 as a club with legitimate expectations of competing for another Brennus Shield.

No. 11 Stade Rochelais

La Rochelle no longer gets an automatic top-five position based on the championships of its recent past, but dismissing this roster would be equally foolish. The forward identity, big-match experience and home environment at Marcel-Deflandre remain formidable. At its best, La Rochelle can still make matches look fundamentally different by imposing physical pressure that few clubs can withstand. The reason it sits outside the top 10 is recent consistency. The gap between La Rochelle's championship reputation and its week-to-week level has widened enough that the club must prove it belongs back among Europe's absolute elite. Still, there are few teams anyone would be excited to draw in a knockout match.

No. 12 Saracens F.C.

Saracens is the first major buy-low club in the ranking. Fifth place in the PREM looks ordinary until you notice a plus-179 differential, 628 points scored and a statistical profile that looked much more like a championship contender than a team missing the playoffs. Now Tomos Williams, George Martin and Alfie Barbeary join Maro Itoje, Ben Earl and Owen Farrell. The ceiling is obvious. So is the uncertainty. Brendan Venter is replacing Mark McCall as director of rugby, Tom Willis has left and the tighthead situation requires attention. Saracens does not need a complete rebuild. It needs to convert its underlying dominance into enough actual wins to return to the postseason.

No. 13 Section Paloise

Pau's rise is no longer something that can be treated as a charming Top 14 surprise. Section finished fourth, won 17 league matches and earned a home barrage before Racing escaped with a 33-31 victory. That gives Pau more current domestic evidence than several bigger-name clubs below it. The next challenge is proving the breakthrough is sustainable. Pau must now carry the expectations of a playoff-level club while showing it can handle the deepest French rosters in high-pressure matches. There is enough talent and home-field strength to stay in that conversation. No. 13 reflects a club that has graduated from outsider status but has not yet established itself among France's championship fixtures.

No. 14 Munster Rugby

Munster remains the most credible Irish challenger to Leinster, but the preseason picture is complicated. Tadhg Beirne, Jack Crowley and Craig Casey provide the kind of spine around which a championship-caliber team can be constructed, and Munster's defensive foundation keeps it difficult to beat. The immediate concern is Crowley's availability early in the campaign, particularly with a challenging opening stretch. Jean Kleyn's departure also changes the pack. Munster has enough depth and quality to finish near the top of the URC and make another meaningful postseason run. What it lacks compared with the teams above is the combination of current health, roster momentum and recent evidence required to call it a preseason favorite.

No. 15 Hollywoodbets Sharks

The Sharks may have a top-five roster and a No. 15 résumé. That's what makes them one of the hardest teams to place. Their Springbok-heavy squad can produce a front five and midfield capable of overpowering almost anyone, and last season included two wins over the Stormers and a 45-0 demolition of Munster. Yet the Sharks still finished 10th in the URC. The problem is not the ceiling. It is the floor, particularly away from Durban and when international availability disrupts continuity. This ranking stops rewarding theoretical talent alone. If the Sharks finally produce their best rugby consistently, they could jump 10 places without the roster changing at all.

No. 16 Racing 92

Racing's return to the Top 14 semifinals was real progress. The club finished fifth, won a difficult barrage at Pau and demonstrated that its younger core could carry a famous organization back into the French postseason. Then Toulouse won the semifinal 71-17, providing a brutal reminder of the distance between playoff relevance and championship readiness. Racing's attack gives it legitimate upside, but defensive consistency and road performance remain concerns. There is also the unusual challenge of navigating another season around changing home environments. No. 16 respects the resurgence without pretending the rebuild is complete. Racing is again a credible Top 14 playoff club. Becoming a championship club is the next step.

No. 17 Leicester Tigers

Leicester's fourth-place finish undersells a strong first season under Geoff Parling. Tigers went 12-6, posted a plus-178 differential, went 8-1 at Welford Road and won the PREM Rugby Cup with a 66-14 destruction of Exeter. That's a serious foundation. Aaron Wainwright, Mako Vunipola and Joel Sclavi are among the significant additions, but Leicester also lost Hanro Liebenberg, George Martin and substantial forward leadership. That keeps Tigers outside the top 15. The biggest issue remains away form after a 4-5 road record. If the new pack settles quickly and Leicester becomes less dependent on Welford Road, this is a roster capable of returning to the final.

No. 18 Exeter Chiefs

Exeter went from ninth place to the PREM final in one season, making last year's turnaround impossible to dismiss as incremental improvement. Rob Baxter's side finished third, allowed a league-low 367 regular-season points and then went to Bath and won a semifinal. Immanuel Feyi-Waboso, Henry Slade, Dafydd Jenkins, Greg Fisilau and Tom Hooper give Exeter a young core with legitimate championship potential. The hesitation comes from transition. Len Ikitau and Scott Sio are gone, Dallas McLeod arrives later and the opening roster has availability concerns. Exeter has already proved the rebuild works. Now it must show last season was the beginning of another competitive cycle rather than its high point.

No. 19 Sale Sharks

No English team outside the top 10 has more potential to destroy its preseason ranking. Sale finished seventh at 5-13 and failed to beat any of the PREM's final top five. Then it launched one of the league's most aggressive roster reconstructions. Courtney Lawes, Joe Marchant, Alex Lozowski, Nicky Smith, Tomas Francis and Christ Tshiunza join a team that still has George Ford and Tom Curry. On paper, that's a top-four roster. But Sale conceded 602 points and 90 tries last season. Until Mike Forshaw proves the defense has changed, the ranking has to remain conservative. If that unit rebounds, Sale becomes a legitimate championship threat almost immediately.

No. 20 ASM Clermont Auvergne

Clermont remains firmly in the dangerous middle-upper class of European rugby. The attack produced enough points and tries last season to establish that the club has weapons capable of supporting a Top 14 playoff run, and Marcel-Michelin remains one of the competition's meaningful home advantages. The problem is balance. Clermont conceded far too much to consistently live with the teams above it, and an explosive offense can only compensate for defensive instability for so long. The offseason adds more talent, but the fundamental challenge has not changed. Clermont has the ceiling to return to the French postseason. It needs a substantially better defensive floor before it belongs with the genuine championship contenders.

No. 21 Aviron Bayonnais

Bayonne has turned Jean-Dauger into one of the defining home advantages in the Top 14, and that alone makes the club dangerous enough to threaten the postseason. The question is what happens when Bayonne leaves home. The strongest teams in France eventually have to accumulate points in environments where the crowd and familiar rhythms no longer tilt the match their way. That's the dividing line between Bayonne and the clubs immediately above it. The talent is real, the home identity is established and the playoff conversation is justified. But to move toward the top 15 of a cross-league ranking, Bayonne needs a more convincing road profile and deeper evidence against championship-level opposition.

No. 22 Castres Olympique

Castres is precisely the type of club a cross-league ranking can underrate. It does not have the star density of Toulouse, Leinster or the richest English clubs, but Castres is comfortable turning matches into the kind of physical, territorial contests that punish teams unable to adapt. Its home environment and competitive identity give it a higher floor than many more glamorous rosters. The reason Castres remains outside the top 20 is ceiling. There is less evidence that the current squad can consistently overpower the deepest Top 14 clubs or become a serious European championship threat. Castres may not frighten anyone on paper. Playing it is an entirely different experience.

No. 23 Bristol Bears

Bristol's best rugby looks like it belongs much higher than No. 23. The Bears went 7-1 at Ashton Gate itself and showed they could beat Bath, Northampton, Leicester and Exeter. Louis Rees-Zammit, Gabriel Ibitoye and Kalaveti Ravouvou give Pat Lam an extraordinary collection of open-field threats, while the attack can turn turnovers into points almost instantly. Then there is the other Bristol: the team that conceded 94 points at Northampton and finished with 509 points allowed. That volatility is why the Bears stay here. A championship team needs its ordinary performances to remain competitive. Bristol already has the spectacular ceiling. Raising the defensive floor is the entire 2026-27 challenge.

No. 24 Cardiff Rugby

Cardiff earned this position rather than receiving it as the best of a struggling Welsh group. The club finished sixth in the URC and reached the playoffs, while its home record at Cardiff Arms Park included wins against high-quality opposition. That established Cardiff as a legitimate postseason team. There are reasons to expect some regression risk: the overall points differential was modest and Cardiff won a large share of its close matches. Still, the offseason adds useful experience, and the club now enters with something the other Welsh sides are chasing — proof. Cardiff's next step is straightforward. It needs to become less dependent on home-field edge and close-game execution and establish a stronger week-to-week road identity.

No. 25 10Bet Lions

The Lions are considerably more dangerous than a No. 25 ranking might suggest, especially in Johannesburg. They went 8-1 at home last season, won the South African Shield and won four of six South African derbies, including road victories against the Bulls and Sharks. They also produced a 54-12 demolition of Glasgow at Ellis Park. That's real evidence of a team capable of beating opponents ranked much higher here. The problem is portability. The Lions went 2-6-1 away and were comfortably eliminated by Leinster in the URC playoffs. Their young core is improving, but becoming a consistent road team is the next requirement.

No. 26 Ulster Rugby

Ulster's ninth-place URC finish doesn't tell the entire story. They missed the playoffs by only two points, finished with a plus-74 differential and reached the Challenge Cup final, giving them stronger underlying evidence than several teams around them. The attack improved enough to suggest a return to the top eight is realistic, and there remains enough talent in Belfast to make Ulster dangerous against stronger opposition. What keeps them outside the top 25 is the combination of front-five questions, game-management inconsistency and Iain Henderson's injury situation entering the season. Ulster looks more like a playoff contender than a ninth-place team, but it still has to prove it.

No. 27 Lyon OU

Lyon has the resources and individual talent to beat clubs ranked considerably higher, particularly at home. That's why LOU remains ahead of several URC playoff hopefuls despite lacking the recent knockout résumé of the Top 14's leading clubs. The problem is consistency. In a competition as unforgiving as the Top 14, having dangerous players and a substantial home advantage isn't enough if the performance level fluctuates too dramatically across the season. Lyon enters 2026-27 as a team capable of pushing toward the French postseason, but not one that has earned the benefit of the doubt. The ceiling is intriguing. The week-to-week evidence keeps LOU at No. 27.

No. 28 Connacht Rugby

Connacht actually made the URC playoffs, which gives it a stronger recent domestic achievement than several clubs ranked immediately above it. The province also demonstrated improved road capability with meaningful victories away from Galway, an important development for a team whose home environment traditionally supplies much of its edge. The hesitation is about what comes next. Champions Cup rugby adds another layer of difficulty to a squad that already had little margin for error in the URC playoff race. Connacht has enough quality to make the eight again, but maintaining that level while facing a substantially tougher European workload makes a repeat less comfortable than last season's eighth-place finish might suggest.

No. 29 Benetton Rugby

Benetton is no longer interesting simply because an Italian club can challenge established URC teams. The standard has changed: This is now a roster that should expect to compete seriously for the playoffs. The problem is that the league's middle tier has become brutally crowded. Cardiff has broken through, Connacht made the postseason, Ulster's underlying numbers were stronger than its finish and the Lions have developed one of the competition's most imposing home identities. Benetton therefore needs more than occasional statement performances. It needs sustained results against direct top-eight rivals. The talent keeps Treviso firmly in the playoff conversation; the lack of consistent separation from that group keeps it at No. 29.

No. 30 Stade Francais

Stade Français is probably the most uncomfortable placement in the bottom quarter because the club possesses enough resources and talent to make No. 30 look ridiculous. At its best, Paris can absolutely play Top 14 playoff-level rugby, and Jean-Bouin can provide a significant home advantage. The issue is trust. The gap between Stade Français' ceiling and its week-to-week performance has become too large to rank the club based primarily on reputation or roster quality. In this company, potential only goes so far. The teams above Paris either produced stronger recent results or offer a more convincing preseason trajectory. Stade Français can climb quickly, but it needs to make its best rugby repeatable.

No. 31 Harlequin F.C.

Marcus Smith and George Furbank on the same team sounds nothing like the 31st-best club on this list. That's the point. Harlequins' ceiling is dramatically higher than its ranking, but last season's evidence was brutal: ninth place, a 6-12 record, 589 points conceded and a minus-141 differential. At the same time, Quins beat La Rochelle away in Europe, crushed the Stormers 61-10 and finished the PREM season by beating eventual champion Northampton. Robbie Deans' arrival strengthens the case for a rebound, and the Smith-Furbank combination could be spectacular. But the defense and set piece must become dependable before Harlequins can be ranked according to its attacking possibilities rather than its actual results.

No. 32 Edinburgh Rugby

Edinburgh remains firmly inside the URC's enormous playoff-bubble class. There is enough Scottish international quality in the squad to reach the postseason, and its best performances can look entirely at home against top-eight opposition. The difficulty has been sustaining that standard across a full campaign. That's what separates Edinburgh from Glasgow and the other established contenders and also explains why several similarly talented teams sit around it in this ranking. Edinburgh doesn't require a dramatic rebuild to become relevant. It requires consistency. If it can turn winnable matches into points more regularly and establish a higher floor away from home, a significant jump is possible. Until then, No. 32 fits.

No. 33 Gloucester Rugby

This may be the ranking most likely to age badly. Gloucester finished eighth in the PREM at 5-13, conceded 576 points and won only once away, which makes a bottom-10 placement entirely defensible. Then came an extraordinary forward rebuild. Jac Morgan, Dewi Lake, Jean Kleyn, Joe Joyce and Marco Fepulea'i add international leadership, breakdown quality, lineout presence and physicality to a team that desperately needed all four. The departure of Tomos Williams matters, and a defense that poor cannot be fixed simply by reading a transfer list. But Gloucester has materially raised its ceiling. No. 33 reflects what it proved last season; its roster gives it a realistic chance to finish much higher.

No. 34 Ospreys Rugby

The home-road split explains the Ospreys better than almost anything else. They were 6-1-2 at home last season but only 1-1-7 away. That's a competitive rugby team in Wales and a completely different proposition on the road. The offseason makes closing that gap more difficult because Jac Morgan and Dewi Lake have both left for Gloucester, removing two elite Welsh forwards and major leadership pieces. Ospreys still possess enough physicality and structure to frustrate stronger-ranked opponents, particularly at home, and the club's new era at St Helen's adds another variable. But until the road performance improves, the path toward the URC's upper tier remains too narrow.

No. 35 Scarlets Rugby

Scarlets are a team this ranking likes more than last season's 14th-place URC finish. The most important reason is Gareth Anscombe. Scarlets lost several close matches in 2025-26, and adding an experienced fly-half with his game-management and kicking ability directly addresses one of the clearest ways those matches escaped. There is enough young Welsh talent around him to believe the ceiling is higher than 14th. The questions are primarily about the pack, depth and whether improvement arrives quickly enough in a league with an increasingly crowded middle. Scarlets aren't being ranked as a wooden-spoon candidate here. They're being ranked as a plausible 8th-to-12th URC team that still needs to prove the offseason changes translate.

No. 36 Newcastle Red Bulls

There is almost no useful continuity between the Newcastle team that finished last and the one preparing for 2026-27. Last season's numbers were catastrophic: 2-16, 325 points scored and 860 conceded. Then Newcastle rebuilt at extraordinary scale. Hoskins Sotutu, Raffi Quirke, Franco Molina, George Turner, Josh Hodge, Will Rigg and Chris Harris are among roughly two dozen arrivals, while Dan McFarland takes over as head coach. The talent level has increased enormously. So has the uncertainty. Rugby punishes teams without established cohesion, particularly defensively and at set piece. Newcastle could become the biggest riser on this entire list, but preseason optimism cannot erase an 860-point starting point.

No. 37 USA Perpignan

Perpignan is considerably more dangerous than No. 37 sounds when the match is being played at Stade Aimé-Giral. That environment, combined with USAP's physical approach, gives the club a legitimate survival weapon in a league where home results can define an entire season. The difficulty comes when assessing Perpignan across all 40 teams rather than merely within the Top 14 relegation fight. The depth and week-to-week consistency do not match the leading French clubs, and surviving another 26-round season requires far more than occasional home ambushes. Perpignan can beat stronger-ranked opponents and should never be treated as an easy fixture. Over a complete campaign, however, the margin for error remains extremely small.

No. 38 RC Vannes

Vannes earned promotion by dominating Pro D2, and that matters. This isn't a club stumbling into the Top 14 after a lucky postseason run. The roster that earned promotion largely remains together, and the club has added experienced reinforcements designed to give it a better chance of surviving the enormous jump in weekly quality. The home environment in Brittany should also be a genuine asset. But the Top 14 is ruthless with promoted teams, and Vannes already knows how severe that transition can be from its previous top-flight experience. The preseason question isn't whether Vannes belongs professionally. It does. It's whether its depth can survive 26 rounds against one of rugby's deepest domestic competitions.

No. 39 Dragons Rugby

Dragons were better than three URC wins suggest. Nine of their 18 league matches were draws or decided by seven points or fewer, and they reached the Challenge Cup semifinal. Their year-over-year defensive improvement was substantial enough to suggest the project is moving rather than simply repeating another bottom-table season. That's the optimistic case. The harder truth is that Dragons still failed to beat an eventual URC playoff team, struggled to convert close matches and have now lost Aaron Wainwright, their most established Test-level forward. The gap has narrowed. It hasn't disappeared. Dragons enter 2026-27 with a credible path toward climbing the Welsh and URC hierarchy, but results must finally catch up with competitiveness.

No. 40 Zebre Parma

Being No. 40 does not mean Zebre is hopeless. Far from it. The Italian franchise showed a higher ceiling than its URC position suggests, beating the Lions, reaching a Challenge Cup quarterfinal and coming painfully close in several matches that could have transformed the season. Tommaso Allan also gives a young backline exactly the kind of experienced game manager it lacked. But the league baseline remains the weakest among these 40 clubs: two wins, 15 points, a minus-275 differential, an 0-9 road record and 16 consecutive URC defeats after winning the opening two rounds. Zebre's talent is improving. Its next task is making competitiveness sustainable enough to become victories.


What Rugby Competitions Are On FloRugby?

FloRugby streams a wide range of rugby competitions throughout the year, including major domestic leagues, international matches, European club competitions and select age-grade and collegiate events. Available competitions vary by region and broadcast rights, so check the FloRugby schedule for the latest listings.

Where Can I Find Rugby News, Schedules And Results?

FloRugby provides year-round rugby coverage, including breaking news, match previews, lineups, rankings, transfer news, schedules, results and standings. 

Join The Rugby Conversation On FloRugby Social